ANTITRUST CLASS ACTIONS

The Brualdi Law Firm has had significant experience in litigating anti-trust class actions over the years.  Among others, these cases include:

• Taikina v. Nine West Group, Inc. 98 Civ. 0494  (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York), wherein The Brualdi Law Firm was one of the plaintiffs’ counsel in an antitrust action challenging Nine West Group’s alleged violations of the antitrust laws in maintaining the price of its shoes at an artificially high level in violation of the Sherman and Clayton antitrust acts.

• In re: Compact Disc Minimum Advertised Price Antitrust Litig., MDL Docket No. 1361 (United States District Court for the District of Maine), wherein The Brualdi Law Firm was one of the plaintiffs’ counsel in an antitrust action challenging the actions of a number of music companies in allegedly artificially maintaining the price of compact disc’s at artificially high levels in violation of the Sherman and Clayton antitrust acts.

• In re Verizon Antitrust Litig., No. 02 Civ. 6907 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York), wherein The Brualdi Law Firm was one of the plaintiffs’ counsel in an antitrust action challenging the actions of a number of telecommunications companies in allegedly artificially maintaining the price of their services at artificially high levels in violation of the Sherman and Clayton antitrust acts.

• Luna v. BMW of North America, LLC et al., No. 03 Civ. 2488 (United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York), wherein The Brualdi Law Firm was one of the plaintiff’s counsel in an antitrust action challenging the actions of major automobile manufacturers in selling their products at lower prices in Canada, and then prohibiting the resale of these products in the United States.